The same mistakes repeat every IPO season. All five below are avoidable, and the data shows exactly why they cost money.
1. Applying on hype instead of demand
Media buzz is not demand. In ten years of data, IPOs that ended up under 5x oversubscribed opened 5.8% BELOW their offer price on average, while the most oversubscribed IPOs (80x and above) have never opened down. If the crowd is not actually applying, the first day usually shows it.
2. Ignoring which board it lists on
ACE IPOs have averaged +40% first-day opens with wilder swings, while Main Market IPOs averaged under +5%. Same country, very different games. Set expectations by board, not by headlines.
3. Missing the window
Offer windows average about 10 days. Investors who only hear about an IPO from listing-day news never had a chance to apply at the offer price.
4. Having no exit plan
Nearly half of Malaysian IPOs (48%) close their first day below their own opening price. Deciding in advance whether you are flipping at the open or holding through the fade is worth more than most people's stock picks.
5. Treating projections as promises
Any forecast, including CISCOM's, is a statistical range built from history. Ranges can be wrong, and small samples exist in every bucket. Use projections to calibrate expectations, never as a guarantee.
Every number in this chapter comes from the CISCOM database. The same data backs every IPO page.
Start free →